II Ca 3163/23 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; land registry court upheld transfer of easement burden due to municipal land acquisition.

Case Number II Ca 3163/23

Court / Authority Sąd powszechny

Jurisdiction

Poland (PL)

Decision Date 2024-03-11

Outcome Dismissed

Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the municipality's appeal against a land registry entry transferring an easement burden to a newly separated municipal plot. The municipality argued that the land division decision constituted a primary acquisition of ownership, which should extinguish the easement, while the land registry court held that such decisions are merely declaratory. The court ruled that without a specific legal provision or court order explicitly extinguishing the easement, the burden must legally follow the transferred property.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ustawa o księgach wieczystych i hipotece, art. 246 § 2; Rozporządzenie Ministra Sprawiedliwości, § 11 ust. 2: The transfer of ownership to a municipality via a declaratory land division decision does not automatically extinguish registered easements; the burden must be transferred unless explicitly removed by law or court order.

Keywords

AI generated

land registry entry easement burden transfer municipal land acquisition declaratory land division extinguishment of easement real right limitation legal certainty principle

Cited Legislation

AI generated

art. 246 § 2 k.c.

art. 31 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 6 lipca 1982 r. o księgach wieczystych i hipotece

art. 31 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 6 lipca 1982 r. o księgach wieczystych i hipotece

§ 11 ust. 2 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 17 września 2001 r. w sprawie prowadzenia ksiąg wieczystych

art. 12 ust. 1 i 4 ustawy z dnia 10 kwietnia 2003 roku o szczególnych zasadach przygotowania i realizacji inwestycji w zakresie dróg publicznych

art. 385 k.p.c.

art. 13 § 2 k.p.c

art. 246 § 2 k.c

art. 385 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

wyrok NSA z 8.08.2014 r., I OSK 1857/14

wyrok NSA z 21.02.2018 r., I OSK 815/16

Public road land cannot be privately owned; private possession cannot lead to acquisition by prescription.

Supreme Court dismisses appeal on forced mortgage registration when the security right was legally extinguished before the application date.

I OSK 2212/17

I OSK 1857/14

I OSK 815/16

AI generated

Appeal dismissed; court upheld lower court's ruling on easement creation and compensation based on evidence evaluation.

Appeal dismissed for changing the claim; court ruled appeals must stay within original specific request limits.

Appeal dismissed; permanent easement holder cannot unilaterally transfer ownership via administrative subdivision decision.

Court dismissed appeal against land registry entry, ruling one title book equals one property under civil code.

Court allows State to remove permanent use right from land reclassified as public road.

Full text