III K 346/24
AI generated
Court convicts two men of causing serious injury and orders execution of suspended sentences with time served credited.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court found two defendants guilty of causing serious injury to a victim through beating and ordered the execution of their suspended prison sentences. The prosecution argued that the defendants acted jointly with direct intent, resulting in life-threatening organ damage requiring surgery. The court accepted the evidence, noting the prior criminal record of one defendant and the necessity of executing the sentences despite the defendants' financial situation.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 156 § 1 pkt 2 kk; Art. 61 § 1 pkt 1 k.k.: Joint intentional acts causing serious injury result in conviction, and time spent in detention is credited against the executed sentence.
Keywords
AI generated
causing serious injury
joint intentional act
execution of sentence
time served credit
suspended sentence execution
criminal liability
organ damage
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 156 § 1 pkt 2 kk
Art. 61 § 1 pkt 1 k.k.
Art. 230 § 2 k.p.k.
§ 11 ust. 1 pkt 2, ust. 2 pkt 5 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 22 października 2015 r.
Art. 627 k.p.k.
Art. 624 § 1 kpk
Ustawa z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 627 k.p.k
art. 7 k.p.k
art. 156 § 1 pkt 2 k.k
Cited Case Law
AI generatedIII KK 239/15
Supreme Court dismisses appeal against reformatory judgment for lack of evidence of expert instruction violation.
II KK 321/06
II KK 19/08
V KK 206/08
II KK 342/15
Supreme Court partially allowed cassation, quashing conviction for aggravated injury due to improper legal qualification of the act.
III KK 89/17
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on assault, ruling incitement is not participation in a brawl under Polish Criminal Code.
Related Decisions
AI generatedII K 453/16
Court convicts recidivist of theft and imposes mixed penalty due to lack of statutory suspension grounds.
VI Ka 38/14
Court partially allowed appeal by eliminating theft with damage charge and adjusting fine calculation.
VI Ka 225/17
Appeal dismissed; court upheld sentence due to negative criminal prognosis and adequate penalty proportionality.
V KK 466/22
Supreme Court quashes theft conviction for recidivism due to failure to verify prior criminal record documents.
II AKa 123/16
Appeal court upheld first-instance convictions and sentences for organized car theft group leaders.