Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II K 62/24 AI generated

Court sentenced defendant to one year imprisonment for drug possession, rejecting probation due to prior recidivism.

Case Number II K 62/24
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court convicted the defendant of possessing significant quantities of psychotropic substances and sentenced him to one year of imprisonment. The prosecution argued that the defendant's prior conviction in 2023 for similar offenses rendered a suspended sentence inappropriate, as he relapsed during the probation period. The court agreed, noting that the previous positive criminological prognosis was incorrect and that no individual preventive measure could be achieved without immediate execution of the penalty.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ustawa z dnia 29 lipca 2005 r. o przeciwdziałaniu narkomanii, art. 62 ust. 2; Kodeks karny, art. 69 § 1; Kodeks karny, art. 70 ust. 2, 4a; Kodeks postępowania karnego, art. 44 § 2; Art. 627 k.p.k.: When a defendant commits a drug possession offense during the probation period of a prior suspended sentence, the court must impose immediate imprisonment without suspension to ensure individual prevention and resocialization goals are met.

Keywords

AI generated
drug possession offense probation period violation recidivism sentencing psychotropic substances immediate imprisonment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Ustawa z dnia 29 lipca 2005 r. o przeciwdziałaniu narkomanii, art. 62 ust. 2
Ustawa z dnia 29 lipca 2005 r. o przeciwdziałaniu narkomanii, art. 69 § 1
Ustawa z dnia 29 lipca 2005 r. o przeciwdziałaniu narkomanii, art. 70 ust. 2
Ustawa z dnia 29 lipca 2005 r. o przeciwdziałaniu narkomanii, art. 70 ust. 4a
Kodeks karny, art. 44 § 2
Kodeks postępowania karnego, art. 627
art. 387 k.p.k
AI generated
V KK 183/23
Supreme Court quashes appeal verdict for drug possession offense, voiding fine due to mandatory exemption for dependent offenders.
X Ka 1120/23
Appeal dismissed; court rejected defense of cooperation due to contradictory statements and lack of remorse.
II K 108/25
Court convicts defendant of drug trafficking and imposes prison sentence, fine, and mandatory financial contribution.
II K 363/21
Court convicted defendant of drug possession and sentenced to suspended prison term with supervision.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text