Legislator Case Law & Legislation
IV Ka 360/24 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; court upheld conviction and sentence despite defendant's claims of procedural errors and judge bias.

Case Number IV Ka 360/24
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the defendant's appeal against the first-instance conviction and sentence. The defendant argued for a change in the judgment citing violations of procedural law, factual errors, and alleged bias by the presiding judge. The court rejected these claims, finding no objective grounds for excluding the judge and confirming the evidence regarding the defendant's personal situation and financial obligations.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 pkt 1, 2, 3 k.p.k.; The court's assessment of procedural violations and factual errors is binding unless objectively flawed, and a judge's participation does not constitute bias absent objective grounds for exclusion.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal appeal procedure judicial bias assessment procedural law violation factual error review sentence proportionality cost exemption fundamental rights

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 17 ust. 1 i 2 ustawy z 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 64 § 1 k.k
art. 7 k.p.k
art. 167 k.p.k

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text