Court dismissed security request due to lack of sufficient evidence of irreparable harm and urgency.

The court dismissed the applicant's request for a security measure, ruling that the procedural requirements were not met. The applicant, a joint-stock company, argued that specific circumstances necessitated immediate protection against potential losses, while the opposing party contested the necessity of such intervention. The court determined that the evidence presented failed to demonstrate the requisite level of irreparable harm and urgency required to grant the requested security.