Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II Ka 797/24 AI generated

Court dismissed appeal against conviction for theft and fraud, upholding first-instance judgment on facts and law.

Case Number II Ka 797/24
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the defendant's appeal, upholding the first-instance judgment that convicted him of theft and fraud. The defense argued for a change in the verdict based on alleged procedural errors and flawed evidence assessment, but failed to demonstrate specific judicial misconduct. The court ruled that the factual findings were logically sound and supported by the available evidence, rendering the appeal inadmissible.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 pkt 2, 3 k.p.k.; The appellate court may uphold first-instance factual findings if the defendant fails to prove specific procedural errors or logical flaws in the evidence assessment that would have influenced the verdict.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal appeal procedure factual findings review evidence assessment error theft and fraud conviction procedural error standard

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k.
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k.
art. 636 § 1 kpk
art. 627 kpk
art. 2 ust. 1 pkt 3 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k

Cited Case Law

AI generated
wyrok Sądu Apelacyjnego w Krakowie z dnia 8 czerwca 2004 r., sygn. II AKa 112/04
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text