Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II Ka 748/24 AI generated

Appeal against drug trafficking conviction dismissed; defense costs awarded to state; defendant bears procedural costs.

Case Number II Ka 748/24
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court dismissed the defense's appeal regarding the conviction for drug trafficking but ordered the state to pay defense costs for the second instance. The defense argued factual errors and excessive sentencing, yet the court found no grounds to overturn the first-instance verdict. Consequently, the judgment upholding the conviction was maintained while reallocating financial burdens between the parties.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k.; Art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k.: The appeal is rejected when factual findings are not erroneous and the sentence is not grossly disproportionate, resulting in the upholding of the first-instance conviction.

Keywords

AI generated
drug trafficking conviction appellate review standard factual error argument procedural costs allocation defense costs award gross disproportionality test second instance judgment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 59 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 20 lipca 2005 roku o przeciwdziałaniu narkomanii
art. 56 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 29 lipca 2005 roku o przeciwdziałaniu narkomanii
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k.
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k.
art. 634 k.p.k.
art. 636 § 1 i 2 k.p.k.
art. 627 k.p.k.
art. 8 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text