II Ka 504/24
AI generated
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first-instance conviction for theft and rejected procedural and factual errors claims.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Court of Appeal dismissed the appeals filed by the defense attorneys for two defendants convicted of theft. The defense argued that the first-instance judgment contained procedural errors and factual mistakes that affected the verdict. The court found no merit in these claims and upheld the original conviction and sentence.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 438 § 2, 3, 4 k.p.k.; Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.; The appeal court rejects claims of procedural errors, factual mistakes, or excessive punishment if the first-instance judgment is substantively correct and the appeal arguments lack legal basis.
Keywords
AI generated
criminal appeal procedure
procedural error claim
factual error claim
excessive punishment claim
theft conviction
dismissal of appeal
court costs allocation
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 8 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 2 ust. 1 pkt 3 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 46 §2 k.k
art. 437 § 2 k.p.k
Cited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedII AKa 120/20
Appeal court increased sentence to nine years and ordered therapeutic system execution for defendant R.K.
IV Ka 407/25
Appeal dismissed; combined sentence upheld as not excessively harsh despite multiple prior convictions.
IV Ka 7/23
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first-instance conviction for operating illegal gambling machines with intent.
II K 110/20
Court combines two prison sentences into one term of four years and two months using the asperation principle.
II AKa 220/22
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first-instance acquittal and temporary detention despite procedural arguments regarding Art. 552 § 4 k.p.k.