Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II Ka 168/24 AI generated

Criminal appeal court modifies sentence by adding income source, legal qualification, sentencing basis, and business ban.

Case Number II Ka 168/24
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The District Court in Siedlce modified the first-instance judgment to include the defendant's income source, specific legal qualifications, and a five-year ban on providing public healthcare services. The prosecution and defense appealed, arguing for changes based on procedural errors and factual inaccuracies regarding the defendant's circumstances. The appellate court accepted these arguments, amending the legal characterization and imposing the additional restriction while upholding the original conviction.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 pkt 2, 3, 4 k.p.k.; Art. 64 § 2, 65 § 1, 41 § 2, 43 § 1, 4 § 1 kk; The court may modify a first-instance judgment if the appeal demonstrates a procedural error affecting the judgment's content or a significant factual error, resulting in the addition of legal qualifications and supplementary criminal measures.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal appeal procedure modification of judgment business ban measure income source determination legal qualification error procedural error impact factual error correction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k.
Art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k.
Art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k.
Art. 64 § 2 kk
Art. 65 § 1 kk
Art. 41 § 2 kk
Art. 43 § 1 kk
Art. 4 § 1 kk
Art. 636 § 1 kpk
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text