II W 169/23
AI generated
Court convicts driver of speeding in built-up area and imposes fine for reckless overtaking.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court convicted the defendant of speeding in a built-up area and imposed a fine of 1,000 zloty. The defendant contested the accuracy of the police speed measurement and claimed the officer failed to show the device's data during the control. The court rejected these arguments, confirming the device was calibrated and the measurement was legally conducted.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 92a § 2 kw; Art. 24 § 1, § 3 kw: The court established that a driver who exceeds the speed limit in a built-up area by a significant margin, particularly when overtaking multiple vehicles, is guilty of an offense warranting a fine, and the defendant must bear court costs.
Keywords
AI generated
speeding offense
built-up area limit
police speed measurement
overtaking multiple vehicles
court costs allocation
traffic violation fine
driver liability
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 92a § 2 kw
Art. 24 § 1 kw
Art. 24 § 3 kw
Art. 92 § 2a kw
Art. 119 § 1 kw
Related Decisions
AI generatedIX Ka 805/15
Court dismissed appeal against speeding fine, upholding original verdict and awarding costs to the state.
VII W 194/18
Court dismissed defendant's speeding defense, ruling video radar evidence valid and imposing a fine.
II W 422/16
Court convicted driver of speeding violation and imposed fine based on traffic law provisions.
II W 857/19
Court convicted driver of speeding 84km/h in built-up zone despite officer's procedural errors.