VI Ka 680/24 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal against conviction for theft, upholding first-instance judgment on facts and law.

Case Number VI Ka 680/24

Court / Authority Sąd powszechny

Jurisdiction

Poland (PL)

Decision Date 2024-12-05

Outcome Dismissed

Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the defendant's appeal against the first-instance conviction for theft under Article 244 of the Criminal Code. The defense argued that the legal qualification of the act was incorrect and that factual findings were erroneous, but the court found no merit in these claims. Consequently, the appellate court upheld the original verdict, confirming the defendant's guilt and sentencing.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 pkt 1, 3 k.p.k.; Art. 244 k.k.; The court of appeal upholds a first-instance criminal judgment when the appellate court finds no error in the legal qualification of the act or in the established facts.

Keywords

AI generated

criminal appeal theft conviction legal qualification error factual findings dismissal of appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Art. 244 k.k.

Art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k.

Art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k.

Art. 8 w zw. z art. 2 ust. 1 pkt 3 i ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. opłatach w sprawach karnych

§ 1 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 18 czerwca 2003 r. w sprawie wysokości i sposobu obliczania wydatków Skarbu Państwa w postępowaniu karnym

art. 244 k.k

art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k

art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k

art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k

art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k

AI generated

VI Ka 467/24

Appeal dismissed; defense lawyer's procedural error and factual claim rejected; defendant exempted from appeal costs.

VI Ka 254/25

Court dismisses defense appeal on factual errors but awards defense costs and exempts defendant from court fees.

II AKa 74/22

Appeal dismissed; court upheld first instance conviction and sentencing despite procedural errors.