Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II Ka 611/24 AI generated

Criminal appeal upheld; court imposes one-year prison sentence for aggravated theft under Polish Criminal Code.

Case Number II Ka 611/24
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The District Court in Garwolin initially sentenced the defendant to one year in prison for aggravated theft, a decision appealed by the prosecutor on grounds of excessive punishment and factual errors. The District Court in Siedlce rejected these arguments, affirming the lower court's findings and upholding the conviction under Article 233 of the Criminal Code. Consequently, the appeal court imposed the one-year prison sentence and ordered the defendant to pay court costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 233 § 1 k.k.; Art. 19 § 1 k.k.; Art. 91 § 1 k.k.; Art. 438 § 4 k.p.k.; Art. 627 k.p.k.; Art. 635 k.p.k. – The court of appeal may uphold a first-instance criminal judgment regarding both guilt and sentencing when the prosecutor's appeal fails to demonstrate a gross disproportionality in the penalty or a material error in the established facts.

Keywords

AI generated
aggravated theft criminal appeal gross disproportionality factual findings prison sentence court costs Criminal Code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 233 § 1 k.k.
Art. 19 § 1 k.k.
Art. 91 § 1 k.k.
Art. 438 § 4 k.p.k.
Art. 627 k.p.k.
Art. 635 k.p.k.
Ustawa z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
AI generated
II AKa 301/21
Court dismissed appeal on facts and law, upholding conviction and sentencing for lease fraud.
VI Ka 29/24
Court acquits defendant on two charges due to factual errors in first-instance findings.
IV Ka 737/25
Court dismissed prosecutor's appeal on factual errors, ruling evidence assessment was correct and sufficient.
II Ka 359/23
Court dismissed prosecutor's appeal against acquittal, upholding first-instance verdict on criminal charges.
II AKa 34/21
Appeal court partially allowed appeal, quashing confiscation for one defendant and reducing probation period for both.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text