Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II AKa 106/24 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; defense lawyer's procedural error and excessive sentence claim rejected by Warsaw Court of Appeal.

Case Number II AKa 106/24
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Warsaw Court of Appeal dismissed the defense lawyer's appeal against the first-instance judgment in a criminal case involving theft and attempted robbery. The defense argued for a lighter sentence and the invalidity of the proceedings, but the court found no grounds to overturn the conviction or the penalty. Consequently, the original verdict was upheld, and the defense lawyer was ordered to pay court costs for the appeal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 pkt 2, 4 k.p.k.; Art. 439 k.p.k.; The court of appeal may dismiss an appeal if the first-instance judgment is legally sound and the defense's claims regarding procedural errors or excessive sentencing are unfounded.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal appeal excessive sentence procedural error dismissal of appeal court costs theft and robbery legal representation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k.
Art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k.
§ 2 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 14 maja 2024r.
§ 4 pkt 3 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 14 maja 2024r.
§ 17 pkt 5 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 14 maja 2024r.
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text