Legislator Case Law & Legislation
IX U 170/22 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal by omitting expert medical opinions as irrelevant evidence under Polish Civil Procedure Code.

Case Number IX U 170/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the appeal by omitting expert medical opinions from the evidence list. The appellant, M. O., challenged the Social Insurance Office's decision regarding a sick leave benefit, arguing that laryngology, medicine, and internal medicine expert reports were necessary. The court ruled that these specific opinions were irrelevant to the legal issues at hand, citing the relevant articles of the Civil Procedure Code.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 235 § 1 pkt 2, 5 k.p.c.; The court may omit evidence deemed irrelevant to the resolution of the dispute when the facts are sufficiently established by other means.

Keywords

AI generated
omission of evidence irrelevant evidence expert medical opinion sick leave benefit civil procedure code appeal dismissal social insurance office

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 235 § 1 pkt 2 i 5 k.p.c.
o zasiłek chorobowy postanowił: na podstawie art. 235 2 § 1 pkt 2 i 5 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

sygnatura akt IX U 170/22 POSTANOWIENIE 2 sierpnia 2024 r. Sąd Rejonowy Szczecin – Centrum w Szczecinie IX Wydział Pracy i Ubezpieczeń Społecznych w składzie: Przewodniczący: sędzia Magdalena Żarkowska po rozpoznaniu 2 sierpnia 2024 r. w S. na posiedzeniu niejawnym sprawy z odwołania M. O. przeciwko Zakładowi Ubezpieczeń Społecznych Oddziałowi w S. o zasiłek chorobowy postanowił: na podstawie art. 235 2 § 1 pkt 2 i 5 k.p.c. pominąć dowód z opinii biegłych z zakresu laryngologii, medycyny i interny. Sygn. akt IX U 170/22 ZARZĄDZENIE 1. (...) 2. (...) 3. (...), 4. (...)