Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II K 336/23 AI generated

Court sentenced defendant to prison for threats, insults, attempted entry, and property damage.

Case Number II K 336/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court found the defendant guilty of five distinct criminal acts and imposed cumulative prison sentences totaling six months. The defendant argued for leniency based on the context of a failed relationship, but the court rejected this, citing the defendant's extreme determination and the severity of the threats and property damage. Consequently, the court ruled that no mitigating circumstances existed and that the defendant deserved the highest possible penalty for each offense.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 190 § 1 k.k. w zw. z art. 12 § 1 k.k.; Art. 216 § 2 k.k.; Art. 13 § 1 k.k. w zw. z art. 193 k.k.; Art. 288 § 1 k.k.; Art. 124 § 1 kw. The court established that threats, insults, attempted unlawful entry, and property damage constitute serious offenses where the defendant's motive of revenge for a relationship breakdown does not justify leniency, warranting maximum punishment.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal threats insults via internet attempted unlawful entry property damage revenge motive cumulative sentencing no mitigating circumstances

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 190 § 1 k.k. w zw. z art. 12 § 1 k.k.
Art. 216 § 2 k.k.
Art. 13 § 1 k.k. w zw. z art. 193 k.k.
Art. 288 § 1 k.k.
Art. 124 § 1 kw.
art. 387 k.p.k
AI generated
II K 172/19
Court convicted defendant of threats and property damage, imposing 10 months prison despite limited capacity.
II Ka 265/18
Court dismisses appeal against sentence for continuous threats, upholding 6-month prison term and proximity ban.
II K 811/17
Court convicted defendant of theft and drunk driving, imposing combined 2-year prison sentence with lifetime ban.
III KK 213/22
Supreme Court quashes appeal due to failure to serve judgment reasoning, violating defense rights.
VI Ka 84/18
Court partially allowed appeal, acquitting defendant on some charges but increasing sentence and combining punishments.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text