XIV W 1919/13
AI generated
Court convicts driver of speeding violation and orders payment of fine and procedural costs.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court found the defendant H. O. guilty of speeding by 46 km/h and imposed a fine of 1,000 PLN. The prosecution successfully argued that the MultaRadar CD device accurately recorded the violation, and the defendant failed to rebut this evidence. Consequently, the court ruled in favor of the prosecution, convicting the driver and ordering the payment of the fine along with procedural costs.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 92a k.w.; Art. 118 § 1, 3 k.p.w.; Art. 119 k.p.w.; Art. 627 k.p.k.: The court may convict a driver for speeding based on radar evidence and order the payment of a fine and procedural costs when the violation is proven.
Keywords
AI generated
speeding violation
radar evidence
criminal conviction
traffic fine
procedural costs
Multaradar device
driver liability
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 92a k.w.
Art. 118 § 1, 3 k.p.w.
Art. 119 k.p.w.
Art. 627 k.p.k.
art. 119 k.p
art. 627 k.p.k