Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VIII U 1166/23 AI generated

Appeal against social security pension recalculation dismissed due to lack of new facts justifying higher amount.

Case Number VIII U 1166/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the appeal filed by H. K. against the Social Insurance Institution's decision to recalculate her pension. The appellant argued for a higher pension amount based on specific circumstances, but the court found no new facts or evidence to support this claim. Consequently, the original decision regarding the pension calculation was upheld without modification.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.; Art. 18 ust. 1 k.r.s.: An appeal against a social security decision is rejected if the appellant fails to present new facts or evidence that would justify a different outcome than the original administrative decision.

Keywords

AI generated
social security appeal pension recalculation lack of new facts administrative review Social Insurance Institution

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.
Art. 18 ust. 1 k.r.s.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt VIII U 1166/23 WYROK W IMIENIU RZECZYPOSPOLITEJ POLSKIEJ Dnia 7 sierpnia 2023 roku Sąd Okręgowy w Łodzi VIII Wydział Pracy i Ubezpieczeń Społecznych w składzie Przewodniczący sędzia SO Jacek Chrostek Protokolant sekretarz M. B. po rozpoznaniu w dniu 7 sierpnia 2023 roku w Łodzi na rozprawie sprawy z odwołania H. K. od decyzji Zakładu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych I Oddział w Ł. z dnia 15 czerwca 2023 roku znak (...) o ponowne ustalenie wysokości emerytury oddala odwołanie. SSO Jacek Chrostek