Court allows appeal by granting free legal aid and waiving appeal fees for indigent defendant.

The appellate court granted the defense's request to change the first-instance judgment, ruling in favor of the defendant. The defendant argued that the lower court incorrectly applied legal provisions regarding the qualification of the criminal act and failed to properly address procedural errors. The court found these arguments valid, noting the constitutional unconstitutionality of specific fee regulations and the defendant's indigence, which justified waiving costs and providing free legal aid. Consequently, the court ordered the first-instance judgment to be set aside and a new decision rendered consistent with these findings.