Legislator Case Law & Legislation
IV Ka 127/24 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal on procedural grounds for missing compensation order and legal qualification errors.

Case Number IV Ka 127/24
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court dismissed the appeal filed by both the private prosecutor and the defense lawyer regarding the first-instance judgment. The defense argued for errors in legal qualification, procedural violations, and excessive sentencing, while the private prosecutor contested the lack of a compensation order. The court rejected these claims, upholding the original verdict on the merits and the fine imposed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 pkt 1, 1a, 2, 3, 4 k.p.k.; The appellate court lacks jurisdiction to review the merits of the conviction and sentencing when the appeal is filed by a private prosecutor or defense lawyer without a specific request for compensation, and the first-instance judgment already contained a compensation order.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal appeal procedure private prosecutor rights legal qualification error sentencing proportionality compensation order procedural admissibility appellate jurisdiction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 635 k.p.k.
art. 6 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 roku o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 10 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 roku o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 46 § 1 k.k
art. 410 k.p.k

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text