Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III Ko 701/22 AI generated

Court partially allowed compensation claim for prison time, rejecting excessive damages while awarding reasonable amounts.

Case Number III Ko 701/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court partially granted the plaintiff's claim for damages and compensation arising from the execution of a prison sentence. While the plaintiff sought substantial sums for wrongful imprisonment and contract breaches, the court found the imprisonment consequences typical and not severe enough to justify the requested high compensation. Consequently, the court awarded a reasonable compensation of 40,000 PLN and a specific damages amount of 7,338.44 PLN, dismissing the remainder of the request.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 552 § 2 k.p.k.; Art. 554 § 4 k.p.k.: The court must assess the severity of suffering caused by imprisonment to determine appropriate compensation, rejecting excessive claims while awarding amounts that reflect the actual harm and fulfill the compensatory purpose without being symbolic.

Keywords

AI generated
compensation for imprisonment damages for wrongful conviction prison sentence execution reasonable compensation standard criminal procedure costs state liability psychological impact assessment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 552 § 2 k.p.k.
Art. 554 § 4 k.p.k.
§ 11 ust. 6 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 22.10.2015r.
§ 17 pkt 1 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 22.10.2015r.
art. 552§2 k.p.k
art. 554 §4 k.p.k
art. 64§1 k.k
art. 17§1 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 209 §1 k.k
art. 279 §1 k.k

Cited Case Law

AI generated
II KK 196/10
III KK 317/09
III KK 81/17
Supreme Court dismisses civil compensation claim against state for husband's repression, citing insufficient evidence of state responsibility.
AI generated
IX Ka 1449/15
w okresie od dnia 8 czerwca 2009 r., do dnia 7 grudnia 2012 r.
IV K 950/20
Court convicted defendant of alimentary arrears evasion and sentenced to one month imprisonment.
VIII Ka 1036/12
S.został oskarżony o to, że w okresie od 05 czerwca 2010r.
II K 177/22
Court convicted defendant of evading child support, sentencing to six months imprisonment and ordering state costs.
VIII K 386/24
Court sentenced father to restricted liberty and mandatory child support for arrears exceeding three monthly payments.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text