Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III K 45/23 AI generated

Court applies partial absorption principle for combined sentences to avoid unjustified leniency for repeat offenders.

Case Number III K 45/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court upheld the combined sentence of 10 years imprisonment by applying the principle of partial absorption rather than full absorption. The defendant argued for full absorption to reduce the total penalty, but the court found no statutory basis for this approach. The decision prioritizes the preventive and educational goals of punishment over granting unwarranted relief to a recidivist.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 85a k.k.; Art. 86 § 1 k.k.: The principle of partial absorption is the priority rule for combined sentences, as full absorption constitutes an extreme measure requiring special justification and should not be applied to reward repeated criminal behavior.

Keywords

AI generated
combined sentence partial absorption full absorption recidivism Kodeks karny principle of asperacji preventive goals

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 85a k.k.
Art. 86 § 1 k.k.
Art. 572 k.p.k.
Art. 87 § 1 k.k.
art. 278 § 1 k.k
art. 64 § 1 k.k
art. 91 § 1 k.k
art. 4 § 1 k.k
art. 86 § 1 k.k
art. 572 k.p.k

Cited Case Law

AI generated
postanowienie SN z 8 listopada 2006 roku III KK 63/06
wyrok SA w Gdańsku z dnia 25 października 2007 roku sygn. akt II AKa 301/07
wyrok SN z 2 grudnia 1975 roku Rw 628/75
wyrok SA w Katowicach z dnia 13 listopada 2003 roku, II AKa 339/03
wyrok Sądu Apelacyjnego w Lublinie z dn. 16.03.2010r o sygn. II AKa 57/10
III KK 63/06
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text