II W 964/22
AI generated
Court convicts driver of speeding on built-up road and imposes fine despite denial of guilt.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court convicted the defendant of speeding and imposed a fine of 500 PLN. Although the defendant claimed his brother drove the vehicle, the court rejected this defense based on the defendant's status as the sole owner, expert identification of the driver, and physical differences between the brothers. Consequently, the court upheld the conviction and ordered the payment of the fine, court fees, and expert costs.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 92a Kodeksu wykroczeń; Art. 20 ust. 1 Prawa o ruchu drogowym: The court must determine guilt based on all evidence, including expert opinions and witness testimony, and cannot accept a defendant's denial of driving the vehicle if the defendant is the sole owner and the expert identifies them as the driver.
Keywords
AI generated
speeding offense
built-up area
driver identification
expert opinion
criminal fine
court costs
possession of vehicle
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 92a Kodeksu wykroczeń
Art. 20 ust. 1 Prawa o ruchu drogowym
Art. 2 § 1 Kodeksu wykroczeń
Art. 9 Kodeksu wykroczeń