II W 56/23
AI generated
Court convicted driver of speeding in built-up area, rejecting denial of guilt based on radar accuracy.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court convicted the defendant of speeding in a built-up area and sentenced him to a fine of 400 zlotys. The defendant denied guilt and challenged the accuracy of the police speed measurement, but the court rejected these arguments. The decision relied on the police officer's testimony, the video recording of the measurement, and the legal requirement for drivers to exercise due care.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 92a § 1 kw; Art. 24 § 1, 3 kw; Art. 33 § 1-4 kw; Art. 119 § 1 k.p.w.: The court may convict a defendant for a traffic offense based on police testimony and technical evidence if the defendant's denial lacks credibility and fails to substantiate claims regarding measurement accuracy.
Keywords
AI generated
speeding offense
built-up area
radar measurement
criminal conviction
fine imposition
due care standard
police testimony
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 92a § 1 kw
Art. 24 § 1, 3 kw
Art. 33 § 1-4 kw
Art. 119 § 1 k.p.w.
Related Decisions
AI generatedII W 363/22
Court upheld speeding conviction and 1500 PLN fine, rejecting defendant's appeal on procedural grounds.
VII W 736/15
Court convicted driver of speeding, rejecting radar device identification argument due to officer testimony.
II W 495/21
Court convicts driver of speeding, sets 200 PLN fine, orders costs and expert fees.
II W 10/24
Court convicts driver of speeding violation based on police radar testimony and inconsistent defendant defense.
VI W 5395/15
Court convicted driver of speeding, upheld City Guard's prosecution power, and imposed a fine.