II W 382/22
AI generated
Court convicted defendant of intentional property damage for cutting a gate lock, imposing a fine and compensation.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court convicted the defendant of intentional property damage for cutting a gate lock and imposed a fine and compensation. The defendant denied the charges, claiming he used a key to open the gate, but the court rejected this based on consistent witness testimony and video evidence. Consequently, the court found the defendant guilty and sentenced him to a monetary penalty and ordered restitution for the damaged property.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 124 § 1 k.k.; Art. 24 § 1, 3 k.k.; The court established that intentional destruction of another's property, evidenced by credible witness statements and physical evidence, constitutes a criminal offense warranting conviction and punishment.
Keywords
AI generated
intentional property damage
criminal conviction
monetary fine
civil compensation
burden of proof
witness testimony
criminal procedure
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 124 § 1 k.k.
Art. 24 § 1 k.k.
Art. 24 § 3 k.k.
Art. 33 § 1-3 k.k.
Art. 124 § 4 k.k.
Art. 119 § 1 k.p.w.
Related Decisions
AI generatedII K 489/17
Oskarżony M. S. (1) i K. S. zawarli związek małżeński, z którego pochodzą dwie córki: starsza N. S. (1) oraz młodsza N. S. (2). Obecnie między małżonkami toczy się postępowanie o rozwód z orzekaniem o winie M. S. (1). Pokrzywdzeni K. M. (1) oraz C. M. (1) są rodzicami K. S. oraz dziadkami N. i N. S. (2). Mieszkają przy ul. (...) w K., w mieszkaniu położonym na parterze.
II K 247/20
Court acquits defendant of theft but convicts of property damage, imposing a fine and partial court costs.
II K 376/14
Court conditionally dismissed theft charges for minor property damage and ordered restitution to victims.
II K 27/14
Court convicted defendant of theft and imposed suspended sentence with behavioral obligations.
II K 787/19
Court convicted defendant of theft and burglary, imposing suspended sentence and civil compensation.