II W 35/23
AI generated
Court upheld a speeding conviction and imposed a fine and state costs for exceeding speed limits in a built-up area.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court upheld the first-instance verdict finding the defendant guilty of speeding in a built-up area and sentencing him to a fine. The prosecution argued the defendant exceeded the 50 km/h limit by approximately 32 km/h, while the defense contested the facts but the court found the evidence sufficient. Consequently, the appellate court rejected the appeal and confirmed the conviction along with the award of state costs.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 92a § 2 k.w.; Art. 24 § 1a, 3 k.w.: The court established that when evidence sufficiently proves a traffic violation of exceeding speed limits in a built-up area, the defendant is guilty and liable for the statutory fine and procedural costs.
Keywords
AI generated
speeding violation
built-up area
criminal conviction
state costs
appellate review
traffic offense
gratuity penalty
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 92a § 2 k.k.
Art. 24 § 1a k.k.
Art. 24 § 3 k.k.