II W 225/23
AI generated
Court convicts defendant of disturbing peace for shouting and fighting with a tenant at night.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court convicted the defendant of disturbing peace and ordered a fine of 500 PLN plus court costs. The defendant claimed he was helping an evicted tenant, but the court found his version contradictory and unreliable compared to the consistent testimony of the two victims. Consequently, the court rejected the defense and upheld the finding of intentional guilt based on the corroborated accounts of noise and fighting.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 51 § 1 k.k.; Art. 24 § 1, 3 k.k.; Art. 33 § 1-4 k.k. - The court established that a defendant's inconsistent statements and failure to corroborate their version of events, despite clear evidence of noise and conflict, constitute sufficient grounds for a finding of intentional guilt under the peace disturbance statute.
Keywords
AI generated
disturbing peace
nighttime noise
tenant eviction
inconsistent testimony
criminal conviction
fine imposition
burden of proof
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 51 § 1 k.k.
Art. 24 § 1 k.k.
Art. 24 § 3 k.k.
Art. 33 § 1-4 k.k.
Art. 119 § 1 k.p.w.
Related Decisions
AI generatedIX W 1955/15
Court convicted four individuals of disturbing nocturnal rest under Polish law and imposed fines.
IX W 1278/17
Court convicts defendant of disturbing peace with noise and imposes 800 PLN fine.
IV Ka 596/14
Court acquits defendant for noise violation, ruling single acts do not constitute continuous offense.
II W 1015/21
Court convicts neighbors for intentional disturbance of peace with a 200 PLN fine.
XI W 8835/15
Court finds defendant guilty of disturbing peace but grants exemption from penalty under Art. 39 § 1 of Criminal Code.