II W 131/23
AI generated
Court upheld a speeding conviction and fine, rejecting the defendant's appeal against the penalty for driving 62 km/h over the limit.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe appellate court upheld the first-instance judgment convicting the defendant of speeding and imposing a 2,000 zloty fine. The defendant argued for leniency, but the court found the evidence of exceeding the 50 km/h limit by 62 km/h in a built-up area conclusive. Consequently, the court rejected the appeal, maintaining that the penalty was appropriate given the severity of the violation and the defendant's financial capacity.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 92a § 2 k.w.; Art. 24 § 1, 3 k.w.; Art. 119 § 1 k.pw.: The court established that a fine is a suitable penalty for speeding violations where the excess speed is significant and the driver knowingly disregarded traffic safety rules, rejecting appeals based on minor procedural errors or lack of proportionality.
Keywords
AI generated
speeding violation
traffic safety rules
administrative fine
appellate review
proportionality of penalty
built-up area limit
criminal procedure costs
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 92a § 2 k.w.
Art. 24 § 1, 3 k.w.
Art. 119 § 1 k.pw.
Related Decisions
AI generatedII W 55/24
Court convicts driver of speeding over 50 km/h and imposes 1,200 PLN fine for intentional violation.
II W 1226/15
Court convicted driver of speeding in built-up area and ordered fine plus state costs.
II W 805/16
Court convicts driver of speeding violation and imposes fine based on statutory provisions and evidence.
IV Ka 330/21
Appeal dismissed on procedural grounds but partially allowed due to speed measurement error margin.