Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II Ka 964/23 AI generated

Court dismissed defense appeal, upheld first-instance sentence and ordered defendant to pay legal and court costs.

Case Number II Ka 964/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the defense's appeal against the first-instance judgment convicting the defendant of theft. The court found no procedural errors affecting the verdict's substance, as the lower court correctly applied the law and established facts. Consequently, the original sentence was upheld, and the defendant was ordered to reimburse the co-prosecutors for their legal fees and the state for court costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 pkt. 2 k.p.k.; Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.: An appeal based on procedural errors that did not influence the judgment's content must be rejected, and the losing party bears the costs of the appeal proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal appeal procedure procedural error review legal costs reimbursement court costs allocation dismissal of appeal co-prosecutor fees upholding first instance

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
§ 11 ust. 2 pkt 4 w zw. z ust. 7 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 22 października 2015 r. w sprawie opłat za czynności adwokackie
art. 2 ust. 1 pkt 3 w zw. z art. 3 ust. 1 w zw. z art. 8 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 433 § 1 k.p.k
art. 440 k.p.k

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text