II Ka 95/24
AI generated
Court partially allowed appeal, quashing one ruling while upholding conviction and ordering defendant to pay legal costs.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe District Court in Siedlce partially upheld the appeal filed by the defendant against the first-instance judgment. The defendant argued for quashing the decision based on errors in legal qualification, procedural violations, and factual findings under Articles 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The court found the appeal admissible but determined that the specific grounds for quashing the conviction were not met, resulting in the partial rejection of the appeal while ordering the defendant to pay the victim's legal costs.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 438 pkt 1, 2, 3 k.p.k.; The court may partially quash a judgment when specific grounds for appeal are valid but do not justify overturning the entire verdict, leaving the remaining parts in force.
Keywords
AI generated
partial appeal success
legal qualification error
procedural violation
factual finding error
legal costs allocation
code of criminal procedure
quashing judgment
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 624 k.p.k.
§ 11 ust. 2 pkt 4 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 22 października 2015 r. w sprawie opłat za czynności adwokackie
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 46 § 1 k.k
art. 437 § 2 k.p.k
Cited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedII AKa 254/17
oskarżonego z art. 13 § 1 k.k. w zw. z art. 18 § 1 k.k. w zw. z art. 189a § 1 k.k.; art. 13 § 1 k.k. w związku z artykułem 18 § 1 k.k. w zw. z art. 189a § 1 k.k. w zw. z art. 64 § 1 k.k.; 18 § 1 k.k. w zw. z art. 189a § 1 k.k.; art. 13 § 1 k.k. w zw. z art. 18 § 1 k.k. w zw. z art. 189a § 1 k.k.; art. 258 § 3 k.k. w zw. z art. 258 § 1 k.k.
II K 728/16
W dniu 1 lipca 2016 roku pod dom 89 – letniej E.
VI Ka 327/19
Appeal court partially allowed defense appeal, overturning joint liability order against third party while upholding main verdict.
II K 701/22
Court convicted defendant of fraud, ordered restitution, and credited prison time to sentence.