II Ka 921/23
AI generated
Appeal dismissed; defendant's defense upheld; costs awarded to state and defense lawyer.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Court of Appeal dismissed the defense's appeal against the first-instance judgment, upholding the conviction for alcohol-related offenses. The defendant argued procedural errors and factual inaccuracies, but the court found no grounds to alter the original ruling. Consequently, the appeal was rejected, and costs were allocated to the state and the defense lawyer.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 438 § 2, 3, 4 k.p.k.; Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.; The court's decision to dismiss an appeal is final when the first-instance judgment is free of procedural errors, factual mistakes, or disproportionate sentencing.
Keywords
AI generated
criminal appeal procedure
alcohol abuse offense
procedural error review
factual error assessment
disproportionate sentencing
court costs allocation
defense lawyer fees
Cited Legislation
AI generated§ 11 ust. 2 pkt 4 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 22 października 2015 r. w sprawie opłat za czynności radców prawnych
art. 636 § 1 kpk
art. 618 § 1 pkt 1 i 11 kpk
art. 2 ust. 1 pkt 2 w zw. z art. 8 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 4 k.p.k
Cited Case Law
AI generatedTrybunał Konstytucyjny z dnia 20 grudnia 2022 r. w sprawie SK 78/21
Related Decisions
AI generatedIV Ka 704/25
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first-instance judgment on alcohol dependence and penalty proportionality.
II Ka 223/25
Appeal dismissed for excessive sentence; court upheld original judgment on alcohol treatment and rental facts.
III K 30/19
Court convicted defendant of attempted murder and bodily harm, sentencing to four years imprisonment.
IV Ka 236/25
Court partially allows appeal by changing probation conditions due to procedural error in applying domestic violence measures.