II Ka 884/23 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; defendant bears full appeal costs as defense was entirely groundless under Polish Criminal Procedure Code.

Case Number II Ka 884/23

Court / Authority Sąd powszechny

Jurisdiction

Poland (PL)

Decision Date 2024-01-31

Outcome Dismissed

Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The District Court in Siedlce dismissed the defendant's appeal against the first-instance conviction for attempted theft. The defense argued procedural errors and factual mistakes, but the court found these arguments entirely groundless. Consequently, the original sentence was upheld, and the defendant was ordered to pay the full amount of appeal costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 3 ust. 1 w zw. z art. 8 ustawy o opłatach w sprawach karnych: A defendant appealing a conviction must bear the full cost of the appeal proceedings if the appeal is found to be entirely groundless.

Keywords

AI generated

criminal appeal costs of proceedings groundless appeal conviction upheld Criminal Procedure Code

Cited Legislation

AI generated

art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.

art. 3 ust. 1 w zw. z art. 8 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych

art. 618 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.k.

§ 1 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 18 czerwca 2003 r. w sprawie wysokości i sposobu obliczania wydatków Skarbu Państwa w postępowaniu karnym

art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k

art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k

art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k

art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k

art. 439 k.p.k

art. 437 § 2 k.p.k