Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II Ka 844/23 AI generated

Court dismissed appeal against sentence for theft, upholding first-instance judgment on merits.

Case Number II Ka 844/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the defendant's appeal against the first-instance judgment convicting him of theft under Article 190a of the Criminal Code. The defendant argued procedural errors and factual inaccuracies, but the court found no grounds to overturn the conviction or the imposed sentence. Consequently, the original verdict was upheld, and costs were allocated according to the law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 k.p.k.; Art. 636 k.p.k.; The Court of Appeal dismisses an appeal against a criminal sentence when the first-instance judgment is free from procedural errors and the facts are established correctly, thereby upholding the original conviction and penalty.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal appeal dismissal of appeal theft conviction procedural error factual findings costs allocation upholding verdict

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 2 ust. 1 pkt 3 Ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
Art. 3 ust. 2 Ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
§ 1 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 18 czerwca 2003 r. w sprawie wysokości i sposobu obliczania wydatków Skarbu Państwa w postępowaniu karnym
Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text