Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II Ka 834/23 AI generated

Criminal appeal partially allowed; court modifies crime description dates while upholding conviction and costs.

Case Number II Ka 834/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court partially modified the first-instance judgment by correcting the specific time periods of the alleged criminal acts. The defendant appealed claiming procedural errors and factual inaccuracies, but the court found these arguments insufficient to overturn the conviction or the penalty. Consequently, the court upheld the original verdict regarding guilt and sentencing while adjusting the factual description of the crime timeline.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 pkt 2, 3 k.p.k.; Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.: An appeal based on alleged factual errors or procedural defects may result in a modification of the description of the criminal act if the error affects the judgment, without necessitating a full acquittal or reduction of the penalty.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal appeal factual error procedural defect crime description court costs partial modification criminal procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
§ 11 ust. 2 pkt 4 w zw. z ust. 7 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 22 października 2015 r. w sprawie opłat za czynności adwokackie
art. 2 ust. 1 pkt 4 w zw. z art. 8 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 7 k.p.k
art. 167 k.p.k

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text