Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II Ka 615/23 AI generated

Criminal appeal partially allowed: Court removed aggravating circumstances and reduced property value in theft sentencing.

Case Number II Ka 615/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court partially modified the first-instance judgment regarding a theft conviction by removing specific aggravating language and adjusting the value of stolen goods. The defense successfully argued that the original description of the crime included unnecessary details about premeditation and a specific timeframe not fully supported by evidence. Consequently, the court eliminated the reference to 'short intervals' and 'pre-conceived intent' from the crime description and the legal qualification, while also recalculating the damaged property value downward.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 278 § 1 kk; Art. 12 § 2 kk: The court may modify a criminal judgment by removing unsupported aggravating circumstances and correcting the valuation of stolen property when the first-instance description lacks sufficient factual basis for such qualifiers.

Keywords

AI generated
theft conviction aggravating circumstances property valuation criminal appeal sentencing modification premeditation intent court correction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 278 § 1 kk
Art. 12 § 2 kk
Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 633 k.p.k.
Art. 3 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
AI generated
VII Ka 772/25
Appeal court quashes lower court verdict due to procedural error requiring full retrial under Polish Criminal Procedure Code.
VI Ka 680/24
Appeal dismissed; court upheld conviction for theft under Art. 244 KK against defense's factual and legal errors.
IV Ka 372/22
Appeal dismissed for excessive sentence; court found no gross disproportionality between crime severity and 9-month penalty.
VI Ka 738/23
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first-instance sentence for attempted murder while ordering defense costs from the state.
II AKa 248/25
Appeal court increases sentence to 6 years 1 month due to prosecutor's appeal on legal qualification.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text