II Ka 608/23
AI generated
Criminal appeal dismissed; defendant loses appeal on procedural and factual grounds and pays court costs.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Court of Appeal in Siedlce dismissed the defendant's appeal against a first-instance conviction for theft. The defendant argued procedural errors and factual mistakes but failed to provide evidence supporting these claims. Consequently, the court upheld the original verdict and ordered the defendant to pay the full court costs.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 636 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 8 w zw. z art. 2 ust. 1 pkt 3 ustawy o opłatach w sprawach karnych; The appeal is inadmissible when the defendant fails to substantiate procedural or factual errors, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal and the imposition of court costs on the convicted party.
Keywords
AI generated
criminal appeal dismissal
procedural error argument
factual error argument
court costs imposition
theft conviction upheld
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 8 w zw. z art. 2 ust. 1 pkt 3 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
§ 1 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 18 czerwca 2003 r. w sprawie wysokości i sposobu obliczania wydatków Skarbu Państwa w postępowaniu karnym
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 437 § 2 k.p.k
art. 454 § 1 k.p.k
Cited Case Law
AI generatedWyrok SA we Wrocławiu z 18.06.2019 r., II AKa 92/19
Related Decisions
AI generatedII Ka 362/22
Court partially quashes first-instance verdict on one count of attempted theft while upholding the rest.
II Ka 18/23
Court dismisses appeal and quashes first-instance conviction, ordering dismissal of criminal proceedings due to negligible social harm.
II Ka 20/24
Appeal dismissed; defendant ordered to pay full costs including legal fees and state court fees.
II Ka 424/21
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first-instance conviction for criminal acts under Art. 93 § 1 kw due to lack of procedural errors.
IV Ka 234/23
Court quashes lower court verdict for error in assessing social harm of threats as negligible.