II Ka 517/23
AI generated
Criminal appeal dismissed; prosecutor's appeal upheld; state pays defense costs for public defender.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe District Court in Siedlce dismissed the prosecutor's appeal against the first-instance judgment convicting the defendant of theft. The prosecutor argued for a change in the verdict under Article 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, but the court found no procedural errors affecting the outcome. Consequently, the original conviction was upheld, and the state was ordered to pay the public defender's fees incurred during the appeal.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 438 § 2 k.p.k.; Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.; The appeal is dismissed if the prosecutor fails to demonstrate that a procedural error influenced the judgment, and the state bears the costs of the public defender's services in the appeal proceedings.
Keywords
AI generated
criminal appeal dismissal
prosecutor appeal
public defender costs
procedural error review
state expense liability
theft conviction
code of criminal procedure
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 438 § 2 k.p.k.
Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
§ 11 ust. 2 pkt 4 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 22 października 2015 r. w sprawie opłat za czynności adwokackie
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 437 § 2 k.p.k
art. 454 § 1 k.p.k
Cited Case Law
AI generatedTrybunał Konstytucyjny z dnia 20 grudnia 2022 r. w sprawie SK 78/21
Related Decisions
AI generatedII Ka 925/23
Appeal dismissed; defense argued procedural error but court upheld conviction and costs under Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
II Ka 121/22
Court dismissed appeal challenging legal qualification of theft act under Polish Criminal Code.
II Ka 51/22
Court dismissed appeal on criminal conviction for theft, rejecting claims of legal error and procedural violation.
II Ka 226/25
Appeal dismissed; lower court upheld conviction for attempted theft under Polish Criminal Code.
II Ka 303/23
Court dismissed appeal on criminal conviction, upholding original judgment despite procedural and sentencing errors raised by defense.