II Ka 490/23
AI generated
Appeal dismissed; defense failed to prove factual errors under Art. 438(3) k.p.k. warranting sentence change.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Court of Appeal in Siedlce dismissed the defense's appeal against the first-instance conviction for attempted theft. The defense argued that the court erred in its factual findings regarding the defendant's actions, citing Article 438(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The appellate court rejected these claims, finding no evidence of factual errors that could influence the verdict, and upheld the original sentence.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 438 ust. 3 k.p.k.; Art. 634 k.p.k.; Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 627 k.p.k.; Art. 8 ust. 1 ustawy o opłatach w sprawach karnych; An appeal based on alleged factual errors is dismissed if the appellate court finds no such errors that could have influenced the first-instance judgment.
Keywords
AI generated
Code of Criminal Procedure
factual errors appeal
attempted theft conviction
appeal dismissal
court costs allocation
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 438 ust. 3 k.p.k.
Art. 634 k.p.k.
Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 627 k.p.k.
Art. 8 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
Related Decisions
AI generatedII Ka 437/24
Criminal appeal dismissed; defendant's defense of procedural error and factual mistake rejected by appellate court.
VI Ka 179/20
Court partially acquitted defendant, acquitting one charge but upholding conviction and sentence for remaining charges.
IV Ka 613/24
Appeal dismissed; court upheld conviction for tax fraud despite arguments on sentencing and procedural errors.
IV Ka 1151/21
Appeal court upholds first instance verdict on criminal charges and exempts defendant from appeal costs due to poverty.
II AKa 579/21
Appeal dismissed; court upheld conviction for attempted murder and rejected defense arguments on legal qualification and sentencing.