II Ka 466/23 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; court upheld original sentence for attempted theft, rejecting defense's factual error claim.

Case Number II Ka 466/23

Court / Authority Sąd powszechny

Jurisdiction

Poland (PL)

Decision Date 2023-09-11

Outcome Dismissed

Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court dismissed the defense's appeal against the first-instance conviction for attempted theft, upholding the original sentence. The defense argued that the court erred in its factual findings regarding the defendant's actions, but the appellate court found no such error. Consequently, the decision to maintain the conviction and order the defendant to pay court costs was confirmed.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 pkt. 3 k.p.k.; Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.: An appeal based on alleged factual errors is rejected if the appellate court finds no material impact on the verdict, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal and the upholding of the original judgment.

Keywords

AI generated

attempted theft factual error appeal dismissal of appeal court costs criminal procedure code

Cited Legislation

AI generated

art. 438 pkt. 3 k.p.k.

art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.

art. 8 w zw. z art. 3 ust. 1 Ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych

§ 1 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 18 czerwca 2003 r. w sprawie wysokości i sposobu obliczania wydatków Skarbu Państwa w postępowaniu karnym

art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k

art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k

art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k

art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k

art. 439 k.p.k

art. 115 § 2 k.k