II Ka 437/24 AI generated

Criminal appeal dismissed; defendant's defense of procedural error and factual mistake rejected by appellate court.

Case Number II Ka 437/24

Court / Authority Sąd powszechny

Jurisdiction

Poland (PL)

Decision Date 2024-09-20

Outcome Dismissed

Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court dismissed the defendant's appeal against the first-instance judgment convicting him of theft under Article 270 § 1 of the Criminal Code. The defense argued for a change in the verdict based on alleged procedural errors and factual mistakes, but the court found no grounds to overturn the original decision. Consequently, the first-instance ruling was upheld in full, and the defendant was ordered to pay court costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 pkt 2, 3 k.p.k.; Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.: An appeal based on alleged procedural errors or factual mistakes is dismissed if the appellate court finds no such defects affecting the judgment's substance.

Keywords

AI generated

criminal appeal procedural error factual mistake theft conviction court costs appellate review dismissal of appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated

art. 270 § 1 kk

art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k.

art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k.

art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.

art. 3 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych

§ 1 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 18 czerwca 2003 r. w sprawie wysokości i sposobu obliczania wydatków Skarbu Państwa w postępowaniu karnym

art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k

art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k

art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k

art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k

AI generated

II Ka 860/23

Court quashes first-instance acquittal due to factual errors regarding the defendant's identity in the criminal case.

VI Ka 348/22

Appeal against criminal conviction dismissed; costs and fees awarded to defendant by appellate court.

VI Ka 316/23

Appeal court dismisses joint sentence and terminates proceedings due to procedural error requiring new trial.

II Ka 751/22