II Ka 435/24
AI generated
Appeal dismissed; defense failed to prove procedural error or excessive penalty under Polish Criminal Procedure Code.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe appellate court dismissed the defense's appeal against the first-instance conviction for attempted theft. The defense argued for procedural errors and excessive sentencing, but the court found no grounds to overturn the original judgment. Consequently, the conviction was upheld, and the defendant was ordered to pay the full costs of the appeal proceedings.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 636 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 3 ust. 1 ustawy o opłatach w sprawach karnych; The appeal is inadmissible if the defense fails to demonstrate a procedural error affecting the verdict or a glaring disproportionality in the penalty, resulting in the full bearing of appeal costs by the accused.
Keywords
AI generated
criminal appeal procedure
excessive penalty review
procedural error standard
court costs allocation
attempted theft conviction
disproportionate punishment
appellate court ruling
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 3 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
§ 1 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 18 czerwca 2003 r. w sprawie wysokości i sposobu obliczania wydatków Skarbu Państwa w postępowaniu karnym
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 437 § 2 k.p.k
art. 454 § 1 k.p.k
Cited Case Law
AI generatedwyrok SA we Wrocławiu z 18.06.2019 r., II AKa 92/19
IV KK 139/06
Related Decisions
AI generatedII Ka 102/21
Appeal court partially allowed appeal by eliminating co-defendant liability for specific burglary acts due to lack of evidence.
II Ka 131/21
Appeal dismissed; defense arguments rejected; court upheld first-instance judgment on criminal appeal.
II Ka 236/22
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first-instance conviction for theft and rejected defense's factual error claim.
VII Ka 362/21
Appeal against acquittal dismissed; prosecutor's factual error claim rejected by appellate court.
IV Ka 601/20
Court dismissed appeal claiming omitted facts and procedural errors regarding victim provocation and lack of contact.