II Ka 428/24 AI generated

Criminal appeal dismissed; defense failed to prove procedural errors or factual mistakes affecting the verdict.

Case Number II Ka 428/24

Court / Authority Sąd powszechny

Jurisdiction

Poland (PL)

Decision Date 2024-09-16

Outcome Dismissed

Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the defense's appeal against the first-instance judgment in its entirety. The defense argued for procedural errors and factual mistakes under Articles 438(2) and 438(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, but the court found these claims baseless. Consequently, the defendant was ordered to bear all costs of the appeal proceedings.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 ust. 2, 3 k.p.k.; Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.; The appeal is dismissed when the defendant fails to substantiate procedural violations or factual errors that could have influenced the first-instance judgment, thereby confirming the rule that the appellant bears the full cost of the appeal.

Keywords

AI generated

criminal appeal dismissal procedural error argument factual error argument costs of appeal proceedings defense appeal failure Criminal Procedure Code burden of proof appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated

art. 438 ust. 2 k.p.k.

art. 438 ust. 3 k.p.k.

art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.

art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.

art. 2 ust. 1 pkt 2 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych

art. 3 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych

§ 1 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 18 czerwca 2003 r. w sprawie wysokości i sposobu obliczania wydatków Skarbu Państwa w postępowaniu karnym

art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k

art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k

art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k