II Ka 411/24
AI generated
Court partially allowed appeal, increasing compensation for car damage from 4,740.53 PLN to 4,740.53 PLN due to procedural error.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court of appeal partially revoked the first-instance judgment regarding the defendant's intentional damage to a vehicle. The defendant appealed the conviction and the specific compensation amount, arguing procedural errors and legal misclassification. The court found the factual findings correct but adjusted the compensatory award to strictly match the proven loss value, while dismissing other claims.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 438 pkt 1, 2, 3 k.p.k.; The court may partially revoke a first-instance judgment to correct errors in legal qualification or factual findings if such errors affect the outcome, but must uphold correct factual determinations unless they warrant a new trial.
Keywords
AI generated
intentional damage
civil compensation
appeal procedure
legal qualification error
factual findings
court of appeal
partial revocation
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k.
Art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k.
Art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k.
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 437 § 2 k.p.k
art. 454 § 1 k.p.k
Related Decisions
AI generatedII Ka 847/23
Wyrok Sądu Rejonowego w Siedlcach z dnia 20 września 2023 r.
II Ka 259/24
Criminal appeal dismissed; lower court's sentence upheld as no procedural error affected the judgment.
IX Ka 262/22
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k. – obraza przepisów prawa materialnego w zakresie kwalifikacji prawnej czynu przypisanego oskarżonemu art. 438 pkt 1a k.p.k. – obraza przepisów prawa materialnego w innym wypadku niż wskazany w art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k., chyba że pomimo błędnej podstawy prawnej orzeczenie odpowiada prawu
II Ka 586/23
Wyrok Sądu Rejonowego w Zamościu z dnia 5 czerwca 2023r., sygn.
II Ka 510/24
Court dismissed appeal against conviction for aggravated theft, upholding first-instance judgment on legal and factual grounds.