Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II Ka 382/24 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; sentence upheld for theft despite defense's claim of excessive punishment and good work record.

Case Number II Ka 382/24
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the defense's appeal against the first-instance conviction for theft and upheld the original sentence. The defense argued that the penalty was excessively harsh given the defendant's good work record, while the prosecution maintained the conviction was legally sound. The court rejected these claims, finding no justification for reducing the sentence or overturning the conviction.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 438 § 4 k.p.k.: An appeal based on excessive punishment or a good character record is rejected if the penalty remains proportionate to the crime and no procedural error affected the verdict.

Keywords

AI generated
excessive punishment good work record theft conviction proportionality principle criminal appeal sentence reduction Art. 438 k.p.k.

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 2 ust. 1 pkt 3 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
§ 1 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 18 czerwca 2003 r. w sprawie wysokości i sposobu obliczania wydatków Skarbu Państwa w postępowaniu karnym
art. 64 § 1 k.k
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 53 § 1 k.k

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text