Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II Ka 340/24 AI generated

Court dismissed defense appeal against conviction for theft, upholding first-instance judgment on facts and law.

Case Number II Ka 340/24
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The District Court in Siedlce upheld the first-instance judgment convicting the defendant of theft and ordered the defense to pay court costs. The defense appealed claiming procedural errors and factual mistakes under Articles 438 and 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The appellate court found no grounds to overturn the conviction, as the evidence established the crime and the sentencing was appropriate.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 pkt 2, 3 k.p.k.; Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.; The appellate court may dismiss an appeal when the first-instance judgment is free of procedural errors and factual findings are supported by evidence, resulting in the maintenance of the original conviction.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal appeal procedure theft conviction procedural error review factual findings error court costs allocation maintenance of judgment defense appeal dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 8 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 2 ust. 1 pkt 2 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 424 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 286 § 1 k.k
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text