Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II Ka 337/23 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; defendant's defense of procedural error and excessive sentence rejected by court.

Case Number II Ka 337/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the defendant's partial appeal regarding the conviction and sentence for the crime of theft. The defense argued for procedural errors and excessive punishment, but the court found no grounds to overturn the first-instance judgment. Consequently, the original verdict was upheld in full, and the defendant was ordered to pay court costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 § 2 k.p.k.; Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.: The court rejected the appeal when the defense fails to demonstrate procedural violations affecting the verdict or a grossly disproportionate sentence, resulting in the upholding of the first-instance judgment and the imposition of costs on the convicted party.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal appeal procedure procedural error defense excessive sentence claim court costs allocation upholding first instance verdict

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 438 § 2 k.p.k.
Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 2 ust. 1 pkt 3 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
§ 1 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 18 czerwca 2003 r. w sprawie wysokości i sposobu obliczania wydatków Skarbu Państwa w postępowaniu karnym
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text