Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II Ka 317/23 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; defense failed to prove procedural error under Art. 438(2) K.P.K. affecting sentence.

Case Number II Ka 317/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the defendant's appeal against the first-instance judgment convicting him of theft. The defense argued for a procedural error under Article 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, claiming it could have influenced the verdict, but offered no evidence. The court found the appeal entirely unfounded and upheld the original conviction while ordering the defendant to pay court costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 ust. 2 k.p.k.; Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.; An appeal based on a procedural error that did not affect the outcome is inadmissible, and the appellant bears the costs if the appeal is rejected.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural error appeal dismissal court costs theft conviction unfounded appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 438 ust. 2 k.p.k.
Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 8 ustawy o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 75 § 1 k.p.k
art. 138 k.p.k
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text