II Ka 275/24 AI generated

Criminal appeal dismissed; conviction for attempted theft upheld; procedural errors rejected by appellate court.

Case Number II Ka 275/24

Court / Authority Sąd powszechny

Jurisdiction

Poland (PL)

Decision Date 2024-07-31

Outcome Dismissed

Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court dismissed the defendant's appeal against the first-instance conviction for attempted theft. The defense argued that the legal qualification of the act was incorrect and that factual findings were flawed, but the court found no merit in these claims. Consequently, the original judgment was upheld, and the defendant was ordered to pay court costs and legal representation fees.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 pkt 1, 1a, 2, 3 k.p.k.; Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.; The court rejected appeals based on alleged errors in legal qualification, procedural violations, or factual findings when the lower court's reasoning remains sound and the conviction is substantiated by evidence.

Keywords

AI generated

criminal appeal attempted theft legal qualification error factual findings court costs procedural violation upheld conviction

Cited Legislation

AI generated

art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k.

art. 438 pkt 1a k.p.k.

art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k.

art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k.

art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.

art. 8 w zw. z art. 3 ust. 1 Ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych

§ 1 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 18 czerwca 2003 r. w sprawie wysokości i sposobu obliczania wydatków Skarbu Państwa w postępowaniu karnym

§ 11 ust. 2 pkt 4 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 22 października 2015 r. w sprawie opłat za czynności adwokackie

art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k

art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k

AI generated

VII Ka 575/22

Appeal court reduced sentence by removing recidivism aggravation and reclassifying crimes under Polish Criminal Code.

IV Ka 572/25

Appeal court reduced prison sentence for excessive punishment under Art. 438(4) of Criminal Procedure Code.

II K 93/23

Court convicted defendant of aggravated non-support under Art. 209 § 1a k.k. and suspended prison sentence.

IX Ka 956/23

Appeal dismissed; appellate court upheld acquittal due to legal prohibition on worsening defendant's position on appeal.