Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II Ka 255/23 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; court upheld first-instance sentence for attempted theft and waived defendant's appeal costs.

Case Number II Ka 255/23
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the defendant's appeal against the first-instance conviction for attempted theft under Article 286 of the Criminal Code. The defendant argued procedural errors and factual inaccuracies, but the appellate court found no grounds to overturn the original judgment. Consequently, the sentence was upheld, and the court ordered the state to reimburse the defendant's legal aid costs while exempting the defendant from further appeal expenses.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 k.p.k.; Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.; The appeal is dismissed if the first-instance judgment is substantively correct and the defendant's arguments regarding procedural errors or factual mistakes do not justify a change in the ruling.

Keywords

AI generated
attempted theft criminal appeal procedural error factual mistake legal aid costs waiver of costs dismissed appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 286 § 1 k.k.
Art. 438 k.p.k.
Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 29 ust. 1 Prawo o adwokaturze
§ 17 ust. 2 pkt 4 i § 4 ust. 3 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 3 października 2016 r. w sprawie ponoszenia przez Skarb Państwa kosztów nieopłaconej pomocy prawnej
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text