Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II Ka 235/24 AI generated

Criminal appeal dismissed; defense arguments on procedural errors and factual findings rejected by appellate court.

Case Number II Ka 235/24
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court dismissed the defense's appeal against the first-instance judgment convicting the defendant of the crime under Article 160 § 2 of the Criminal Code. The defense argued for a change in the verdict based on alleged procedural violations and factual errors, but the court found these claims baseless. Consequently, the original sentence was upheld, and the defendant was ordered to pay the court costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 pkt 2, 3 k.p.k.; Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.: An appeal based on alleged procedural errors or factual mistakes is dismissed if the appellate court finds no such errors affecting the verdict, resulting in the upholding of the first-instance judgment and the imposition of costs on the appellant.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal appeal dismissal procedural error argument factual finding error court costs award upholding first instance verdict defense appeal rejection Criminal Procedure Code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k.
Art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k.
Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 8 ustawy o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 437 § 2 k.p.k

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text