Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II Ka 210/24 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; defense failed to prove procedural error or factual mistake affecting the conviction.

Case Number II Ka 210/24
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court dismissed the defense's appeal in its entirety, upholding the first-instance judgment against the defendant. The defense argued for changes based on alleged procedural violations and factual errors under Articles 438 and 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, but the court found these claims baseless. Consequently, the conviction was maintained, and the defendant was ordered to pay court costs totaling 3,020 zloty.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 pkt 2, 3 k.p.k.; Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k. in conjunction with Art. 113 § 1 kks: An appeal is dismissed when the appellate court finds no procedural errors or factual mistakes that could have influenced the first-instance judgment, resulting in the upholding of the original verdict and the imposition of costs on the appellant.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal appeal procedural error factual mistake court costs dismissal of appeal Criminal Procedure Code upholding verdict

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k.
Art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k.
Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 113 § 1 kks
Art. 8 ustawy o opłatach w sprawach karnych
Art. 21 pkt 1 ustawy o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
AI generated
II Ka 609/24
Appeal dismissed; defendant ordered to pay defense costs but waived due to financial hardship.
II Ka 372/21
Appeal dismissed; first-instance conviction upheld due to lack of procedural or substantive errors.
II Ka 925/22
Criminal appeal dismissed; sentence upheld due to lack of excessive penalty claim evidence.
VI Ka 348/22
Appeal against criminal conviction dismissed; costs and fees awarded to defendant by appellate court.
II Ka 149/24
Court dismissed appeals against a criminal sentence, upholding the first-instance judgment on facts and law.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text